via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/74Xum9y


via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/74Xum9y

via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/alNDW0F


via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/alNDW0F

via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/Ifbr2ax


via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/Ifbr2ax

When I'm working on multiple projects simultaneously, it's easy for my desk to build clutter. But having an organizational sys...

When I'm working on multiple projects simultaneously, it's easy for my desk to build clutter. But having an organizational system ensures I can find everything I need. (Jason Hendardy)

I'll be the first to admit that my personal organizational and archiving system is still a work in progress. I hope that as I continue to learn from my peers and suggestions from readers, I'll be able to adopt new approaches and techniques that my future self will be grateful for.

Organization is not something that comes naturally to me.

I say this because it took a number of past experiences, including losing years of work due to a hard drive dying, to make me realize that knowing where your work is stored is just as important as getting the shot or finishing the project. Additionally, having an integrated, organized workflow with built-in redundancy helps me avoid project paralysis and lets me sleep a little better at night.

One Thing: Advice, tips and tricks from the DPReview editors

About this series:
Our team cuts through the noise to share the things that made the biggest impact on our work and what lessons you can bring into your own work.

Read the entire series here.

As I began to work in-house at larger organizations that (no pun intended) lacked organization, I realized being able to find a specific photo, video, or asset quickly is not necessarily something everyone can do or even cares about.

That point of separation is a value proposition that I believe has aided me in continually getting work. A photo editor, producer, or collector may suddenly ask you for something, and if you’re struggling to remember where it may be or, dare I say, it no longer exists for whatever reason, it doesn’t really matter how perfect that photo or video clip you initially captured was.

Here's an example of what my folder structure has evolved to look like over the years. Having something uniform lets me know where to look when I need a particular asset, and helps me easily see what exists at a glance. (Jason Hendardy)

So, here are a few tips I'd share with a friend who may be looking to bring some more organization into their photo or video workflow, which you can take or leave.

  • Have an organizational system that works for you and is easy to keep up. Sometimes simplicity outweighs extreme compartmentalization.

  • Try to build redundancy for everything you care about or may one day care about. Perhaps that means having some final assets live both on a drive and in the cloud or for me it's a Network Attached Storage (NAS) device in addition to external drives that live off premises.
  • Having something in the cloud isn’t foolproof. It may be a good location for one point of redundancy but it doesn’t beat owning fast access to your own data and media. Plus some cloud storage options can be expensive if you have many TBs worth of data.

  • I personally like to have my filenames start with the year. I have my export settings in Capture One set to "[Image Year (yyyy)]_[Image Month (mm)][Image Day of Month (dd)]_[Image Name]," which gives me filenames like 2022_1101_DSCF4300. For me it’s nice to have my files chronological as to when I shot it, and it helps re-tell a story if I ever go back to photos several years later.

Every person or workplace may have a different style when it comes to organization and archiving, but one thing common to all of them is that it takes time, dedication – and sometimes a lost hard drive – to initially get the system set up.

Do you have a specific organizational system you use to archive all your photos, videos, media or personal and/or client work? Let us know in the comments what works for you so the community can learn from each other and explore different approaches.



from Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com) https://ift.tt/57C3nwL
via IFTTT

via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/g9lAGPE


via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/g9lAGPE

Illustration by Shotkit. Earlier this year, Shotkit asked 1,000 photographers what camera equipment they used throughout the year ...

Illustration by Shotkit.

Earlier this year, Shotkit asked 1,000 photographers what camera equipment they used throughout the year and why they opted to use said gear. Now, it’s published the results, which proved to be more interesting than Shotkit expected.

For context of how the survey was done, Shotkit says all submissions were made using JotForm. The link was shared across non-brand-specific Facebook Groups, Shotkit email subscribers and Shotkit Facebook accounts. Shotkit says it was careful to ‘select “neutral” photographer groups to minimize the chance of skewing the results in one direction or another.

As always, there is still plenty of room for discrepancy and while 1,000 is a decent sample size, it’s far from conclusive, particularly on a global level. With all of that noted, let’s dive into the results.

Illustration by Shotkit.

In a surprise to likely no one, mirrorless cameras proved much more popular than DSLRs, with 63% of professional photographers reporting they used a mirrorless camera. 36% reported using DSLRs while only 1% said they consistently used both.

Nikon was the most popular camera brand used by professional photographers, taking 31% of the market share. Canon followed very closely behind with 28%, while Sony came in third place at 20% market share. Interestingly, Sony’s a7 III was the most popular camera amongst professional photographers, while Canon’s R6 and Nikon’s D750 DSLR more or less tied for second and third position.

The leading reason for professionals using mirrorless cameras is due to their smaller and more lightweight form factor. The second biggest reason was due to faster autofocus (compared to DSLRs), according to Shotkit’s survey data.

Illustration by Shotkit.

Mirrorless cameras were also more popular than DSLRs with amateur photographers, but not by as nearly large of a margin: 54% and 46%, respectively. Amateurs also said the size and weight of mirrorless cameras was the reason they opted for them over DSLRs, but in-body image stabilization was the second-biggest reason, rather than the autofocus performance professional photographers noted.

For amateurs, Canon proved to be the most popular brand, holding 27% of the market share. Nikon followed closely behind at 25%, while Sony came in a distant third at 16%, less than one percentage point ahead of Fujifilm, who took 15% market share. As for individual cameras, Fujifilm’s X-T3 took the top spot with Sony’s a7 III following closely behind at 3.7% and 3.2%, respectively. Nikon then took the next three spots with its D850, D750 and D7100, respectively. Canon’s 5D Mark IV, 6D Mark II and R5 cameras all tied for sixth, seventh and eighth place.

You can read the full breakdown of Shotkit’s survey on its website, which has additional graphics and more detailed insight. Shotkit also has an article on industry stats and a breakdown of the most popular photo editing software photographers use.



from Articles: Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com) https://ift.tt/q3wcbLj
via IFTTT

via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/HnjmT2B


via Fstoppers https://ift.tt/HnjmT2B